Petrology of Carbonate Hardgrounds

 A Laboratory Investigation by the Sedimentology & Stratigraphy Class in the Department of Geology at The College of Wooster (Spring 2000)
 

See these three free downloads for hardground and hardground-related resources:

Bioerosion Bibliography (pdf or Microsoft Word)

Marine Hard Substrates Bibliography (pdf or Microsoft Word)

Taylor, P.D. and Wilson, M.A. 2003. Palaeoecology and evolution of marine hard substrate communities. Earth-Science Reviews 62: 1-103. (pdf download)

 

 

Introduction to the Project:

Hardgrounds, synsedimentarily lithified carbonate sea-floors, are fascinating geological and biological systems. They are found throughout the Phanerozoic in sufficient numbers to be geologically useful, yet well-preserved examples are scarce enough to be of unusual interest. Hardgrounds formed under a fairly consistent set of physical parameters, so we can use them to estimate ancient sedimentation and erosion rates, oceanic geochemistry, and tectonic and eustatic changes in sea level. The consistent physical environment offered by hardgrounds also enables us to plot the patterns of evolution of various organisms which became adapted to these hard substrates. These evolutionary patterns can be studied at the clade or community levels. Well-preserved hardground faunas also give us opportunities to analyze a paleoecosystem with an accuracy not possible in most other fossil assemblages.

The Spring 2000 Sedimentology & Stratigraphy class at The College of Wooster is studying carbonate hardgrounds as part of the laboratory component of the course. The College has an extensive hardground collection originally started by Tim Palmer (University of Wales, Aberystwyth) at the Smithsonian and then transferred to Wooster in 1987. He and Mark Wilson (College of Wooster) have added to it considerably since then, making it one of the world's largest collections of hardground specimens. Each student in the Sed/Strat class has a hardground specimen from this collection. His or her task was to make a thin-section and an acetate peel from the sample and then petrographically describe the rock, including such details as grain composition, cement morphology, and diagenetic effects. These reports were then posted on the Web and linked to this main page.

You may see this class at work on our field trip pages. Please also see our related bioerosion topic page.

 

Hardground from the Brassfield Formation (Silurian) of southern Ohio. Note the scoured surface and inconspicuous encrusting bryozoans.

 

 

Bedding plane and cross-section views of a carbonate hardground in the Glen Rose Formation (Cretaceous) of Texas. The large holes are the boring Gastrochaenolites, which was produced by bivalves.

Eocrinoid holdfasts and bryozoans on a hardgrounds from the Middle Ordovician Kanosh Formation of west-central Utah. The holdfasts in the foreground are approximately one centimeter in diameter.
 
 
 The Class
(Click on name to view project page)
Sara Austin
Tim Conklin
Jerome Hall
Ryan Hanson
Tom Johnson
Kate Joynt
Bryan Kinney
Kirk Lapham
Andrea Martin
Michael Miller
Josh Peters
Jared Rhode
Aaron Shear
Ian Vellenga
Laura Clor (TA)
 
Mark Wilson (Professor)

Introduction to carbonate hardgrounds and their faunas:

Sedimentological definition: Hardgrounds are synsedimentarily lithified carbonate sea-floors that became hardened in situ by the precipitation of a carbonate cement in the primary pore spaces. To the sedimentologist studying Recent carbonate sediments, the term describes the consequence of the precipitation of cement within a soft sediment on the sea floor, contemporaneously with or soon after deposition (Bathurst, 1971; Bromley, 1975). Essentially, sedimentation and cementation occur in the same submarine environment, giving rise to a hard sea-floor which may then be colonized by a fauna and flora that show adaptations to hard-substrate dwelling. This happened often in the "calcite seas" of the Ordovician-Silurian and Jurassic-Cretaceous. Ideally, the term should be used for the same circumstances when applied to the ancient record, but it is not always certain that the cementation of the surface of a unit necessarily took place in the same submarine environment in which the bed was originally deposited. Cementation episodes, for example, may also represent intervals of exposure to meteoric waters or burial, with colonization and renewed sedimentation following resubmergence or erosion. Only detailed study of cement textures and fabrics, and maybe trace-elements and isotopes, can distinguish such cases from true hardgrounds formed by synsedimentary submarine cementation.

Paleontological concerns: To the student of the faunas of ancient hard substrates, the details of the environment of substrate cementation or the precise timing of substrate hardening relative to colonization may or may not be important, depending on the type of study. Primary descriptions of community composition, species interactions, succession, or spatial distributions do not necessarily require the elucidation of the substrate's cementation history. Comparative studies, however, in which hardground faunas of different ages are compared in order to determine long term evolutionary trends in community composition and structure, require maximum information about environments of cementation and colonization in order to ensure that the communities being compared across the ages come from as similar environments as possible (Palmer, 1982; Wilson and Palmer, 1992). Just as sedimentological detail may or may not be of concern to the student of hardground faunas, so the faunas may or may not be of concern to the hardground sedimentologist. The principal reason why sedimentologists ignore the fauna at their peril, however, is that it is often the fauna that unequivocally points the finger at the lithified character of the original sediment surface. Although many hardgrounds show a characteristic mineral staining (most commonly by iron minerals) at or just below their surface, which can draw attention to the surface in outcrop, this is not always present (particularly in coarser-grained lithologies). In the absence of such staining it is the presence of the boring and encrusting fauna alone that testifies at the macroscopic level to the originally hard character of the surface.

Outcrop section of an Upper Ordovician hardground in northern Kentucky showing the trepostome bryozoan Stigmatella hanging down on the underside. This shows that the hardground was undermined on the seafloor and small caves developed underneath it. This bryozoan is thus an early cave-dweller. See webpage by Dana Dettmers.

References cited on this page:

Bathurst, R.G.C. 1971. Carbonate Sediments and Their Diagenesis. Developments in Sedimentology 12. Elsevier (Amsterdam). 658 pages.

Bromley, R.G. 1975. Trace fossils at omission surfaces, p. 399-428. In: Frey, R.W. (ed.), The Study of Trace Fossils. Springer-Verlag, New York.

Palmer, T.J. 1982. Cambrian to Cretaceous changes in hardground communities. Lethaia 15: 309-323.

Wilson, M.A. and Palmer, T.J. 1992. Hardgrounds and Hardground Faunas. University of Wales, Aberystwyth, Institute of Earth Studies Publications 9: 1-131.

Hardground assignments:

Each student has a carbonate hardground sample, ranging from the Cambrian through the Tertiary. The students and their assignments are:

Eocene: Castle Hayne Limestone (North Carolina)
Cretaceous, Lower: Walnut Formation - Whitestone Limestone (Texas)
Cretaceous, Lower: Glen Rose Formation (Texas)
Jurassic, Middle: Carmel Formation (Utah)
Jurassic, Middle: Great Oolite, White Limestone (England)
Silurian, Lower: Laurel Limestone (Indiana)
Silurian, Lower: Laurel Limestone (Indiana)
Ordovician, Upper: Richmondian (Ohio)
Ordovician, Middle: Lebanon Limestone (Tennessee)
Ordovician, Middle: Dunleith Formation (Rivoli Mbr), Iowa
Ordovician, Middle: Point Pleasant Limestone (Kentucky)
Ordovician, Middle: Dunleith Formation (Mortimer Mbr), Iowa
Ordovician, Lower: Kanosh Formation
Cambrian, Upper: Snowy Range Formation (Wyoming)

 

Top view of an Upper Ordovician hardground in northern Kentucky with the trepostome bryozoan Stigmatella well developed. Note the borings in the hardground surface to the left of the bryozoan colony. See webpage by Dana Dettmers.

 

 

See these three free downloads for hardground and hardground-related resources:

Bioerosion Bibliography (pdf or Microsoft Word)

Marine Hard Substrates Bibliography (pdf or Microsoft Word)

Taylor, P.D. and Wilson, M.A. 2003. Palaeoecology and evolution of marine hard substrate communities. Earth-Science Reviews 62: 1-103. (pdf download)

 

 

Return to the Sed/Strat course homepage

Wooster Geology Course Pages on the Web

The Wooster Geology Department Homepage